Teams preparing for mainnet often believe that a smart contract audit covers their quality requirements. It does not. Audits are essential — but they examine code logic, not user experience, API integration, or wallet compatibility.
Web3 QA and smart contract audits solve different problems. Conflating the two leads to teams discovering critical functional bugs days before launch, when the cost of fixing them is highest.
What a smart contract audit covers
A professional audit reviews your Solidity or Rust code for vulnerability classes: reentrancy, integer overflow, access control issues, front-running vectors, and logic errors in contract functions. Auditors do not interact with your dApp frontend, test wallet connection flows, or simulate real user paths.
Audit scope is the contract bytecode and its on-chain behaviour. Everything above the contract — the frontend, the API layer, the wallet integration — is out of scope.
What Web3 QA covers that audits do not
Web3 QA tests the full user experience: MetaMask and WalletConnect connection flows on desktop and mobile, transaction signing and rejection handling, gas estimation display accuracy, cross-chain switching behaviour, and API/indexer responses when on-chain state changes.
In a typical pre-mainnet engagement, QaLock catches 10 to 20 bugs that an audit would not surface — disconnect edge cases, UI failures on chain reorg, incorrect token balance display after approval, and mobile Safari wallet incompatibilities.
The right pre-mainnet checklist
Run your smart contract audit 4 to 6 weeks before launch. Begin Web3 QA in parallel, as soon as your testnet deployment is stable. Both processes should complete before any public launch announcement.
QaLock works alongside your audit firm — covering the functional, UX, and integration layer while auditors review contract logic. The result is a comprehensive quality gate, not a partial one.
Want help implementing this for your product?
Book a free 30-minute QA audit — coverage report in 48 hours.